Sonex Fatalities

Discussion topics to include safety related issues and flight training.

Sonex Fatalities

Postby johnr9q@yahoo.com » Tue Mar 17, 2015 11:25 am

Before I build a Sonex I would like to investigate how safe the airplane and Aerovee engine are. I thought the Sonex Pilots and Builders Foundation would be a good place to start but after looking at the information on their site, not sure this is a good resource:
1) Their "Accident Information" page is not very accurate
a) They don't include some recent accidents. i.e. Rio Grande Do Sol 5/10/13, Fawnskin 10/20/14 (This was reported in the Non-Fatal
Accidents & Incidents section but it was a fatal), Palm Coast, Fl 10/3/14
b) In their list of "Non-Fatal Accidents & Incidents", in the first 5 listings 3 of the accidents were fatal
c) When you click on the specific accident you are sent to a NTSB site that says "the page can't be found"
2) I have sent them 2 emails asking where I can find information on the Accidents and Incidents they report and hear nothing back.

Are they still active?
johnr9q@yahoo.com
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:34 pm

Sonex Fatalities

Postby Sonex1517 » Tue Mar 17, 2015 12:35 pm

Hi John

Not sure who you sent emails to but I would like to know. I am the President of the Sonex Builders and Pilots Foundation. I have not gotten any email from you that I am aware of.

Your comments on the website are accurate. We have two people actively working on running the foundation. We both have full time jobs with lots of travelling. We need to update the site.

However, following last years string of incidents our newsletter had a lengthy safety discussion and included those accidents.

I will try to post the link as soon as I can.

The airplane is very safe and statistics continue to show we are the ones causing the accidents.

Robbie Culver
Robbie@sonexfoundation.org
Robbie Culver
Sonex 1517
Aero Estates (T25)
First flight 10/10/2015
325+ hours
Jabiru 3300 Gen 4
Prince P Tip
Taildragger
N1517S
User avatar
Sonex1517
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:11 am
Location: Chicagoland

Sonex Fatalities

Postby Sonex1517 » Tue Mar 17, 2015 12:38 pm

Robbie Culver
Sonex 1517
Aero Estates (T25)
First flight 10/10/2015
325+ hours
Jabiru 3300 Gen 4
Prince P Tip
Taildragger
N1517S
User avatar
Sonex1517
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:11 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Sonex Fatalities

Postby Bryan Cotton » Tue Mar 17, 2015 1:14 pm

The NTSB site is the place to go for accident reports.
http://www.ntsb.gov/_layouts/ntsb.aviation/index.aspx
Bryan Cotton
Poplar Grove, IL C77
Waiex 191 N191YX
Taildragger, Aerovee, acro ailerons
dual sticks with sport trainer controls
Prebuilt spars and machined angle kit
Year 2 flying and approaching 200 hours December 23
User avatar
Bryan Cotton
 
Posts: 5094
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:54 pm
Location: C77

Re: Sonex Fatalities

Postby johnr9q@yahoo.com » Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:02 pm

Robbie: Thanks for your reference to the Sonex Foundation Newsletter page. It was helpful. Would really be interested in knowing how many of the accidents, where engine failure was the culprit, involver Aerovee engines. Is there somewhere where I could research that?
johnr9q@yahoo.com
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:34 pm

Sonex Fatalities

Postby Sonex1517 » Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:11 pm

Hi John

Searching the NTSB reports carefully it is hard to know for sure. Your note about the broken links shows how tenuous linking to their reporting engine is. The links change.

When we looked the AeroVee has no more or less on average than any other VW conversion. The problem is it is extremely difficult to assess the accuracy of this.

As has been often discussed here, in our newsletters, and in a lot of other EAB forums, across the board experimental aviation has a higher fatal accident rate than the rest of GA.

As Jake posted separately today, using a lot of common sense and some basic rules reduces the risk.

This month EAA's Sport Aviation once again repeats the conversation. What kills us is loss of control, fuel issues, and to be blunt poor decisions.

Singling out the AeroVee is not an accurate representation of the issue.

Thanks for getting back to us. Still very interested to hear whom you emailed as we are trying to respond to every email we get.

Robbie
Robbie Culver
Sonex 1517
Aero Estates (T25)
First flight 10/10/2015
325+ hours
Jabiru 3300 Gen 4
Prince P Tip
Taildragger
N1517S
User avatar
Sonex1517
 
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:11 am
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Sonex Fatalities

Postby Bryan Cotton » Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:14 pm

Typically there is mention of the engine type in the NTSB reports, especially if the cause was engine failure. You can either go through the reports, or add things like Aerovee or conversion to your query.
Bryan Cotton
Poplar Grove, IL C77
Waiex 191 N191YX
Taildragger, Aerovee, acro ailerons
dual sticks with sport trainer controls
Prebuilt spars and machined angle kit
Year 2 flying and approaching 200 hours December 23
User avatar
Bryan Cotton
 
Posts: 5094
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:54 pm
Location: C77

Re: Sonex Fatalities

Postby fastj22 » Tue Mar 17, 2015 8:17 pm

johnr9q@yahoo.com wrote:Robbie: Thanks for your reference to the Sonex Foundation Newsletter page. It was helpful. Would really be interested in knowing how many of the accidents, where engine failure was the culprit, involver Aerovee engines. Is there somewhere where I could research that?

I don't think you will find one stop shop for your query. The primary problem is E/AB seem to not have the same degree of investigative energy from the NTSB as certified aircraft. When an experimental goes down due to engine problems, they seem to check a few things, fuel/spark/install error, but rarely document specific issues like they might with a certified engine. I've not seen where they send an uncertified engine off to be torn down. So when a Sonex goes down due to engine failure, we may know if they have an Aerovee or Jabiru installed if you cross reference to the plane registration but will usually not find out much more. I think this is due to two things, limited resources by the NTSB and limited recourse in un-certified installations. In certified engines, if they find a problem that is persistent, they will release a AD for that engine. The best they can do with experimentals is ask the manufacturers to issue a service bulletin (which Sonex has done several times). There was a rare instance with the Zenith CH601 where the FAA grounded that design until a SB was addressed to reinforce the wing spar.

John Gillis
SEL Private, Comm Glider, Tow pilot (Pawnee Driver)
Waiex N116YX, Jabiru 3300, Tail dragger,
First flight, 3/16/2013. 403 hours and climbing.
Home: CO15. KOSH x 5
Flying a B-Model Conversion (Super Bee Baby!)
User avatar
fastj22
 
Posts: 1594
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:56 pm
Location: Mile High

Re: Sonex Fatalities

Postby johnr9q@yahoo.com » Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:08 am

John, Thanks for your information. You said the following: "we may know if they have an Aerovee or Jabiru installed if you cross reference to the plane registration". Can you tell me how to do that cross reference?
johnr9q@yahoo.com
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:34 pm

Re: Sonex Fatalities

Postby fastj22 » Wed Mar 18, 2015 10:17 am

johnr9q@yahoo.com wrote:John, Thanks for your information. You said the following: "we may know if they have an Aerovee or Jabiru installed if you cross reference to the plane registration". Can you tell me how to do that cross reference?

You go to the FAA registration entry of the plane. Usually the engine model is specified. But not always.

Here's mine.
http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry ... rtxt=116YX

John Gillis
SEL Private, Comm Glider, Tow pilot (Pawnee Driver)
Waiex N116YX, Jabiru 3300, Tail dragger,
First flight, 3/16/2013. 403 hours and climbing.
Home: CO15. KOSH x 5
Flying a B-Model Conversion (Super Bee Baby!)
User avatar
fastj22
 
Posts: 1594
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:56 pm
Location: Mile High

Next

Return to Safety and Training

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests