Nose "heavy"

Discussion for builders, pilots, owners, and those interested in building or owning a Sonex.

Nose "heavy"

Postby Skippydiesel » Sat Dec 17, 2022 6:04 pm

My Sonex/Rotax 912 ULS requires constant back pressure (up elevator) to fly straight & level.

I have checked the aileron/flap settings and all are within factory specifications - an ability to adjust the horizontal tail, reduce angle of attack, would correct the problem but I cant see how this might be done.

Any suggestions?
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby Bryan Cotton » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:22 pm

What is your CG?
Bryan Cotton
Poplar Grove, IL C77
Waiex 191 N191YX
Taildragger, Aerovee, acro ailerons
dual sticks with sport trainer controls
Prebuilt spars and machined angle kit
Year 2 flying and approaching 200 hours December 23
User avatar
Bryan Cotton
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:54 pm
Location: C77

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby Skippydiesel » Sat Dec 17, 2022 8:42 pm

Hi Bryan,

W & B data:

Aircraft datum - Wing leading edge
Aircraft moment index - 105935 Kg.mm (5932086.in)
Aircraft empty weight - 340 Kg (749.572 lb)
Aircraft empty weight C of G - 311.34 mm (12.258 in)
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby Bryan Cotton » Sun Dec 18, 2022 12:29 am

I converted your numbers to work in my spreadsheet. The wing leading edge is 52" aft of the standard Sonex datum, the tip of the spinner. If I assume you are 150 lbs and have full fuel, that puts you at 64.38" which is within the CG range, although forward. My worst case forward CG at my weight (200 lbs) is about 65.12". I am working at getting to 170 which would put me at 64.75". At the 65.12" I'm not seeing any trim issues in cruise.

Do you have trim installed? I need to trim throughout the speed range.
Attachments
skippydiesel W&B.xls
(9.5 KiB) Downloaded 111 times
Bryan Cotton
Poplar Grove, IL C77
Waiex 191 N191YX
Taildragger, Aerovee, acro ailerons
dual sticks with sport trainer controls
Prebuilt spars and machined angle kit
Year 2 flying and approaching 200 hours December 23
User avatar
Bryan Cotton
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:54 pm
Location: C77

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby Skippydiesel » Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:27 am

Spring type longitudinal trip - Full Up for duration of test flight(s) - Stick back (& heavy) for most of flight.
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby sonex892. » Sun Dec 18, 2022 5:09 am

Skippy. Your non standard fuel system of main fuel being in the leading edge close to the c of g is quite different to the normal sonex. It wont alter the c of g as much as the standard fuel tank does. That is actually probably a good thing. With the standard tank there is a significant trim change required from full to empty. Providing yours is within normal c of g range it shouldnt be a problem and you will never need as much forward trim as the normal sonex requires with a full tank.
With the spring trim, I would simply experiment and add more tension to the system by either changing or shortening the spring to get more nose up trim. Personally I prefer the trim tab and adding that could be another option. The only time I run out of trim is at low speed. On landing I always go to full aft trim, its still never quite enough but not enough to be a problem.
Steve
Steve
Lazair kit 1981 sold
Sonerai 2LS plansbuilt 2003 sold
Sonex kit 2010
Sonerai 2LS project rotax 912
User avatar
sonex892.
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 12:32 am

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby Skippydiesel » Sun Dec 18, 2022 7:39 am

Hi Steve,

Trim (as in the using spring or tab methods of maintaining the position of a control surface) is, I believe, not the issue. The problem is having so much up elevator (stick back) all the time. The effect is to load the main lifting surface/wing, creating drag, using energy , slowing the aircraft. When in cruise, I would like to see the elevator level with the horizontal stabiliser, only coming into play during ground opps, take off, climb out and slow flight
Skippydiesel
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2021 6:24 am

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby GraemeSmith » Sun Dec 18, 2022 8:16 am

Elevator anti-flutter bungee in place? It applies some back stick pressure.
Graeme JW Smith
User avatar
GraemeSmith
 
Posts: 939
Joined: Sat May 18, 2019 8:58 am
Location: RI

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby T41pilot » Sun Dec 18, 2022 12:45 pm

My "B" model nose pitches down right away if any flap at all is applied. You might check your flap rigging again just to make sure.
Gregg Kaat
Sonex B #0014
T41pilot
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 3:57 pm
Location: Howard City, Michigan

Re: Nose "heavy"

Postby Bryan Cotton » Sun Dec 18, 2022 2:10 pm

T41pilot wrote:My "B" model nose pitches down right away if any flap at all is applied. You might check your flap rigging again just to make sure.

Good point! My classic A model does the same.
Bryan Cotton
Poplar Grove, IL C77
Waiex 191 N191YX
Taildragger, Aerovee, acro ailerons
dual sticks with sport trainer controls
Prebuilt spars and machined angle kit
Year 2 flying and approaching 200 hours December 23
User avatar
Bryan Cotton
 
Posts: 5034
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 9:54 pm
Location: C77

Next

Return to Sonex

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests